Coordinated Minds Profile - Sarah Johnson
⚠️ This is an EXAMPLE Coordinated Minds™ profile for demonstration purposes only.
Aspirational Leaders Co

Your Coordinated Minds Profile

Sarah Johnson - Operations & Systems Manager
Coordinated Minds™ | Aspirational Leaders Co | www.aspirationalleadersco.com
WHAT-WHY
Methodical Problem-Solver
Your Collaboration Style

Your coordinates show the order you want to receive information

Sarah's coordinates are WHAT-WHY, meaning she wants details first, then the purpose behind those details

How you collaborate best: You bring concrete facts and systematic thinking to teams. You need clear details and purpose before engaging, then excel at creating processes that help everyone work together more effectively.

What you contribute: Quality assurance, process improvement, hands-on training, and practical problem-solving that makes team collaboration smoother and more efficient.

Share your coordinates: "My coordinated minds are WHAT-WHY - give me details first, then purpose, and I'll help us build better ways to work together."

Thinking Style Mix

WHAT: 40%
HOW: 30%
WHY: 20%
WHERE: 10%
Collaboration Style
Team Validator

Values feedback and input for confident team decisions

Team Contribution
Process Builder

Optimizes workflows that help teams collaborate better

Problem-Solving
Issue Resolver

Energized by fixing collaboration breakdowns

Working Style
Structure Creator

Builds clear frameworks teams can follow

🤝 How to Collaborate with Sarah

✅ For Effective Collaboration

  • Start meetings with concrete facts and specific details
  • Explain the purpose behind collaborative initiatives
  • Use hands-on demonstrations when teaching new processes
  • Provide clear procedures for team workflows
  • Ask for her input on process improvements
  • Frame challenges as problems the team can solve together
  • Give regular feedback on collaborative efforts
  • Allow time for questions and clarification

❌ What Breaks Down Collaboration

  • Starting with big picture without concrete details
  • Only providing written instructions for complex team tasks
  • Forcing quick team decisions without analysis time
  • Removing established team procedures suddenly
  • Creating too many open-ended options without guidance
  • Only focusing on what's working (she needs problems to fix)
  • Expecting immediate trust without observation time
  • Rushing into action without proper team planning

🧠 Deep Dive: How Sarah's Mind Works

Communication Patterns & Team Dynamics

▼

Self-Certainty vs External Validation

Inner compass vs outside scorecard - Some decide confidently based on their own standards, others feel certain once outside feedback confirms it
Self-Certainty (25%)
External Validation (75%)
"I value getting feedback from my team to make sure I'm on the right track. It helps me feel confident about my decisions."

Your Strength: Values feedback and confirmation from trusted sources. Ensures quality through collaborative validation and team input.

When communicating with Self-Certainty people: Give them space to make decisions independently. Don't overload with feedback or require constant check-ins. Trust their judgment once they've proven competence.

Collaboration Impact:

Sarah ensures quality through team input and builds collective ownership of decisions. She naturally seeks diverse perspectives before moving forward, creating more inclusive collaboration.

Collaboration Growth Awareness:

Your validation-seeking approach builds strong team consensus. However, if you always wait for external confirmation before making decisions, you might miss opportunities to provide decisive leadership when teams need quick direction. Consider when it might serve you to trust your expertise and guide the team forward.

Representational System

How you prefer to process and communicate information - your natural preferred methods for receiving and delivering information
INPUT (How you prefer to receive information):
Kinesthetic - Hands-on Demonstration
OUTPUT (How you prefer to explain to others):
Kinesthetic - Step-by-step Practice
"Show me how to do it first, then let me practice it myself. When I teach others, I like to walk them through each step and have them practice alongside me."

Your Strength: Consistent kinesthetic processing style - learns best through hands-on practice and teaches most effectively through step-by-step demonstration and guided practice.

When communicating with others: Remember that others may prefer visual diagrams or verbal explanations. Adapt your natural hands-on teaching style to include multiple channels when needed.

Collaboration Impact:

Sarah creates effective learning experiences for teams through step-by-step guidance and hands-on practice. She ensures everyone can actually do the work, not just understand it conceptually.

Collaboration Growth Awareness:

Your hands-on teaching style creates deep understanding in teams. However, if you always rely on kinesthetic approaches, you might miss opportunities to connect with team members who process information visually or verbally. Consider when adapting your communication style could enhance team learning.

Same vs Different

Two photos side by side — looking for alignment and similarity first, or noticing gaps and differences
Same (25%)
Different (75%)
"I notice what's not working right away. I can spot when something doesn't match our standard process."

Your Strength: Naturally spots what's wrong, missing, or could be improved. Excellent at quality control and identifying process gaps.

When communicating with Same people: Start by acknowledging what's working well and what matches their expectations. Build on common ground before introducing changes or improvements.

Collaboration Impact:

Sarah acts as the team's quality assurance system, catching errors and process gaps before they become larger problems. She helps teams maintain high standards and continuous improvement.

Collaboration Growth Awareness:

Your ability to spot differences and gaps keeps teams operating at high standards. However, if you always focus on what's wrong or missing, you might miss opportunities to celebrate team successes and build on what's working well. Consider when acknowledging strengths first could enhance team morale and collaboration.

Quick Trust vs Proof Needed

First impression vs multiple references - How much evidence someone needs before they trust or become convinced of something
"I need to observe how someone works and see their results over time before I fully trust their approach."

Your Strength: Balanced approach to trust-building. Takes reasonable time to assess people and situations without being overly cautious or naive.

When working with Quick Trust people: Understand they may move faster than you're comfortable with. When working with Proof Needed people, respect their need for more extensive verification and evidence before trusting.

Channel: Behavioral Evidence + Character Assessment
Mode: Period of Time (about one week)

Collaboration Impact:

Sarah provides stability to teams by taking time to properly assess new people and processes, ensuring team decisions are based on solid evidence rather than first impressions.

Collaboration Growth Awareness:

Your evidence-based approach to trust-building ensures teams make solid decisions about people and processes. However, if you always require extensive proof before trusting, you might miss opportunities to build quick rapport with new team members or move forward when time-sensitive collaborative decisions are needed. Consider when calculated trust could accelerate team formation.

Present Focus vs Future Planning

Being absorbed in the current conversation vs mentally planning your next meeting
Present Focus (70%)
Future Planning (30%)
"I focus best when I'm working on the task at hand. I sometimes get absorbed in what I'm doing right now."

Your Strength: Strong focus on current tasks and immediate priorities. Gets things done in the present while occasionally planning ahead for the day.

When working with Future Planning people: Ask them to share their vision and long-term perspective. Help translate future goals into concrete immediate actions you can execute.

Collaboration Impact:

Sarah keeps teams grounded in current realities and immediate deliverables, ensuring present-moment execution while others focus on long-term planning.

Collaboration Growth Awareness:

Your present-moment focus ensures teams stay grounded in current realities and execute immediate priorities effectively. However, if you always focus on current tasks without considering future implications, you might miss opportunities to help teams anticipate challenges or align current work with long-term collaborative goals. Consider when strategic thinking could enhance team planning.

Motivation Drivers & Team Contribution

▼

Rules vs Options

Following the GPS vs exploring side roads - Some people act because they must (rules, obligations, requirements). Others act because they could (possibilities, opportunities, freedom).
Rules (25%)
Options (75%)
"I prefer having clear guidelines and established procedures. Too many options can feel overwhelming to me."

Your Strength: Thrives with clear procedures and established frameworks. Provides stability and consistency in operations and execution.

When motivating Options people: Give them choices and flexibility in how they approach tasks. Provide the framework but let them determine the specific methods and creative solutions.

Collaboration Impact:

Sarah provides stability and consistency to teams by creating clear frameworks everyone can follow. She reduces confusion and increases collaborative efficiency through structured approaches.

Collaboration Growth Awareness:

Your preference for clear procedures provides teams with reliable structure. However, if you always wait for established guidelines, you might miss opportunities to lead collaborative innovation when teams face novel challenges. Consider when pioneering new approaches could serve team goals.

Things vs Systems vs People

Tools, processes, or relationships - Focus on tangible objects, structured systems, or people and relationships
Things (10%)
Systems (70%)
People (20%)
"I love finding ways to make our workflows more efficient. There's always a better way to organize our processes."

Your Strength: Natural systems thinker who identifies inefficiencies and creates streamlined workflows. Focuses on making processes more effective.

When motivating People-focused individuals: Emphasize how process improvements benefit team members and customers. Show the human impact of efficiency gains and workflow enhancements.

Collaboration Impact:

Sarah naturally identifies bottlenecks and inefficiencies in team workflows. She creates systematic improvements that make collaboration smoother and more productive for everyone.

Collaboration Growth Awareness:

Your systems focus drives valuable process improvements for teams. However, if you always prioritize workflows over relationships, you might miss opportunities to strengthen team bonds and address interpersonal dynamics that affect collaboration. Consider when people-focused attention could enhance team effectiveness.

Toward vs Away

Chasing the bonus vs dodging the penalty - Some are driven by what they want, others by what they don't want
Toward (30%)
Away (70%)
"I get energized when I find problems to solve. It's like putting together puzzle pieces to fix what's broken."

Your Strength: Highly motivated by fixing problems and preventing issues. Energized by troubleshooting and creating solutions to challenges.

When motivating Toward people: Frame tasks in terms of goals to achieve and rewards to gain. Focus on the positive outcomes and benefits of taking action.

Collaboration Impact:

Sarah proactively identifies and resolves collaboration breakdowns before they escalate. Teams benefit from her drive to fix communication gaps and process issues.

Collaboration Growth Awareness:

Your problem-solving drive prevents many team issues from escalating. However, if you always focus on avoiding problems, you might miss opportunities to pursue ambitious collaborative goals and positive team achievements. Consider when toward-focused motivation could inspire team excellence.

Initiate vs Wait

Hitting the starter's gun vs waiting for the green light - Some prefer to act first and create momentum, others hold back until there's a clear signal
Initiate (25%)
Wait (75%)
"I prefer to check with my manager before making significant changes. I want to make sure I have the right approach."

Your Strength: Thoughtful about taking action and seeks guidance before proceeding. Ensures proper authorization and reduces risk through careful planning.

When motivating Initiate people: Give them permission to start without waiting for complete information. Provide clear boundaries but encourage them to take initiative within those parameters.

Collaboration Impact:

Sarah ensures teams move forward with proper coordination and authorization. She prevents teams from rushing into action without adequate planning and stakeholder alignment.

Collaboration Growth Awareness:

Your thoughtful approach ensures teams are well-prepared before taking action. However, if you always wait for complete authorization and perfect information, you might miss opportunities to lead collaborative initiatives when teams need decisive guidance. Consider when taking calculated initiative could advance team goals.

Team Belonging vs Independence

Belonging and relationships vs independence and achievement - This drives whether someone is motivated by being part of something or standing apart from it
Team Belonging (65%)
Independence (35%)
"I work best when I feel connected to my team and know that we're all working together toward the same goals."

Your Strength: Values belonging and collaborative relationships. Works well when feeling connected to and valued by the team.

When motivating Independence people: Emphasize individual achievements and recognition. Give them autonomous projects and independent decision-making authority. Focus on personal mastery and expertise rather than group belonging.

Collaboration Impact:

Sarah naturally creates inclusive team environments where everyone feels they belong and their contributions matter. She builds strong team cohesion and shared ownership of outcomes.

Collaboration Growth Awareness:

Your team-focused approach creates strong collaborative bonds and shared ownership. However, if you always prioritize group belonging over individual expertise, you might miss opportunities to leverage unique individual strengths and specialized contributions. Consider when encouraging individual excellence could enhance overall team capability.

How Else vs What's Next

Brainstorming paths vs following a set route - Some people like to generate multiple ways of doing things. Others feel most comfortable following a clear sequence.
How Else (25%)
What's Next (75%)
"Show me the steps and I can follow them perfectly. I learn best when I can see the process demonstrated first."

Your Strength: Prefers systematic, step-by-step approaches. Excels when given clear procedures and structured frameworks to follow.

When working with How Else people: Give them multiple approaches to choose from. Provide the goal but let them determine the specific method. Encourage them to generate alternative solutions.

Collaboration Impact:

Sarah creates clear procedural frameworks that help teams coordinate effectively and follow structured approaches together. She provides the systematic foundation that enables smooth team execution.

Collaboration Growth Awareness:

Your structured approach provides teams with reliable frameworks and clear steps to follow. However, if you always follow established procedures, you might miss opportunities to adapt quickly when teams face unexpected situations or need creative solutions. Consider when flexible problem-solving could better serve collaborative goals.

Thinking Style Distribution & Team Dynamics

▼

WHAT Thinking (40%) - The Detail Foundation

40%

Sarah needs concrete facts and specific requirements before engaging in collaborative work. She ensures teams have solid informational foundations.

"I need the specific details upfront. Give me the facts and I can build from there."
How this helps teams:

Sarah prevents teams from moving forward with incomplete information. She asks the clarifying questions that ensure everyone understands the specifics before collaborative work begins.

HOW Thinking (30%) - The Process Guide

30%

Focused on methodology and step-by-step procedures that teams can follow together. Creates collaborative workflows.

"Walk me through the process step by step. I learn best when I can see how it's done."
How this helps teams:

Sarah translates complex collaborative goals into clear, actionable steps. She creates the procedural frameworks that help teams coordinate effectively.

WHY Thinking (20%) - The Purpose Connector

20%

Seeks to understand the reasoning behind collaborative efforts. Ensures team alignment on purpose.

"Help me understand why this is important. What problem are we trying to solve?"
How this helps teams:

Sarah ensures collaborative efforts have clear purpose and meaning. She helps teams stay connected to the 'why' behind their work together.

WHERE Thinking (10%) - Development Opportunity

10%

Opportunity to develop strategic vision and outcome visualization for enhanced team leadership.

Growth potential for teams:

As Sarah develops WHERE thinking, she'll be able to help teams visualize collaborative outcomes and strategic end-states, enhancing her already strong operational contributions.

⭐ Communication Strengths

Strength Area Your Natural Ability Leadership Impact
Quality Assurance Naturally spots differences, errors, and process inefficiencies Prevents mistakes and maintains high operational standards
Process Improvement Identifies systematic ways to make workflows more efficient Increases team productivity and reduces operational waste
Hands-on Training Learns and teaches through demonstration and practice Creates effective practical learning experiences for team members
Problem-Solving Energized by troubleshooting and finding solutions to issues Provides reliable crisis resolution and systematic problem analysis
Detail Management Gathers concrete facts and specific requirements effectively Ensures projects have solid informational foundations and clear specifications
Collaborative Validation Seeks team input to ensure quality and make confident decisions Creates inclusive decision-making processes that build team ownership

🎯 Coaching Opportunities

Areas for growth and development based on your natural communication patterns:

Develop WHERE Thinking (Currently 10%)

Growth Focus: Strengthen outcome visualization and big-picture strategic planning abilities for enhanced team leadership.

Action Steps:

  • Practice creating vision statements for projects before diving into details
  • Spend 10 minutes at project start visualizing the ideal collaborative end-state
  • Ask "What does success look like for the team?" before asking "What needs to be done?"

Development Timeline: 3-6 months of consistent practice

Enhance Proactive Leadership

Growth Focus: Build confidence in initiating collaborative improvements without waiting for permission.

Action Steps:

  • Start with small process improvements you can propose independently
  • Practice presenting solutions alongside problem identification
  • Set weekly goals for one proactive team improvement suggestion

Development Timeline: 4-6 months to build proactive confidence

Develop Flexible Problem-Solving

Growth Focus: Build comfort with ambiguous collaborative situations when procedures don't exist.

Action Steps:

  • Practice generating 2-3 different approaches for new team challenges
  • Work on projects with intentionally flexible parameters
  • Partner with Options-oriented colleagues on creative problem-solving

Development Timeline: 6-9 months to build flexibility skills

⚠️ Watch Out For These Blind Spots

Over-reliance on Procedures

Your strong structured approach (75% What's Next) may create challenges when flexibility is required or when established procedures don't exist. Consider developing comfort with ambiguous situations and creative problem-solving approaches.

Watch for: Hesitation when procedures are unclear, difficulty with novel collaborative situations

Present-Moment Focus Limitation

High Present Focus preference (70%) may cause you to miss long-term consequences or strategic opportunities while focused on immediate tasks. Balance current focus with periodic strategic planning.

Watch for: Missing future implications, getting absorbed in current tasks without considering team long-term goals

Wait Pattern Delays

Strong Wait preference (75%) might delay action on time-sensitive improvements while seeking approval or guidance. Look for opportunities to take initiative within established boundaries.

Watch for: Waiting too long for permission, missed improvement opportunities that could benefit team collaboration

🤖 AI Prompts for Your Collaboration Style

These prompts are tailored to your WHAT-WHY collaboration style. Use with ChatGPT, Claude, or other AI assistants to get responses that match your systematic approach to teamwork.

Team Process Improvement Prompt

"I'm a WHAT-WHY collaborator who improves team processes systematically. When helping me optimize team workflows: 1) Show me specific details of how our current collaboration process works, 2) Explain why the current approach creates team friction or inefficiency, 3) Provide step-by-step improvement procedures we can implement together, 4) Focus on systematic changes that make collaboration smoother for everyone involved."

Team Problem-Solving Prompt

"I excel at systematic team problem-solving with WHAT-WHY preferences. When helping me address team challenges: 1) Give me concrete facts about what collaboration breakdown is happening, 2) Explain why this problem matters for team effectiveness and outcomes, 3) Provide hands-on troubleshooting steps the team can follow together, 4) Include methods we can use to test and validate solutions collaboratively."

⭐ Your Unique Collaboration Signature

"The Methodical Collaboration Builder"

Your WHAT-WHY coordinated minds create a collaboration signature that combines concrete detail gathering with purpose-driven analysis, hands-on learning facilitation, and systematic process improvement that makes teams work better together.

What You Bring to Every Team

You ensure teams have concrete facts before making decisions, help everyone understand the purpose behind collaborative efforts, create hands-on learning experiences that get teams aligned, and systematically improve processes that make collaboration more efficient and effective.

How Teams Benefit from Your Style

Teams work better with you because you prevent information gaps, catch quality issues before they become problems, create clear procedures everyone can follow, and build collaborative frameworks that reduce friction and increase productivity.

Your Collaboration Growth Path

As you develop strategic visioning and proactive leadership skills, you'll enhance your already strong systematic foundation to become an even more influential collaborative leader who can guide teams toward shared outcomes while maintaining operational excellence.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY NOTICE

© 2025 Aspirational Leaders Co. All Rights Reserved.

Coordinated Minds™ is a trademark of Aspirational Leaders Co. The Coordinated Minds Assessment™ and associated methodologies are proprietary intellectual property protected by copyright and trademark laws.

This profile and its contents are confidential and proprietary. No part of this document may be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or used for commercial purposes without the express written permission of Aspirational Leaders Co.

For licensing inquiries, contact: www.aspirationalleadersco.com

Aspirational Leaders Co | Coordinated Minds™ Assessment

www.aspirationalleadersco.com